In this season of giving it may seem trite to reiterate the simple fact that we are all connected. Many of us use the holiday season to express this connection through an exchange of gifts and sharing in each other’s presence, but this is also a good time to contemplate the often overlooked facet of human interconnectedness: that our every action has an impact on the people whose lives we share and the world in which we live, and in ways that far surpass cookies, carols, and presents.
Shift the Tide is a project devoted to reminding us to be mindful of this connection in our daily lives. We must remember that even the smallest of daily strides can help to alleviate the burden we lay on our crowded planet. We can each make a difference as one person, and we can absolutely make a difference as many acting as one. The challenge ahead of us is daunting but the little changes we make can ensure that we give one another the best gift of all, the promise of a healthy future.
Happy holidays from Shift the Tide.
21 December 2008
17 December 2008
Meat Consumption and Climate Change
Below is a wonderful article from the New York Times about the direct link between meat consumption and the climate crisis. Everyone should read this article when they get a chance. Reducing meat consumption in your diet reduces more greenhouse gases than changing your car to a Toyota Prius!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/science/earth/04meat.html?_r=1&as%20more%20eat%20meat&st=cse
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/science/earth/04meat.html?_r=1&as%20more%20eat%20meat&st=cse
05 November 2008
Sometimes you just have to eat a banana
Submitted by Meredith Epstein
Ah, the banana: that mellow yellow crescent of tropical sweetness. Pan-fried in a bath of butter and brown sugar. Serving as a vessel for mounds of frozen cream, lattices of chocolaty syrup, and a sprinkling of nuts and cherries. Simmered in a deep pot of black beans with a hint of ginger and cocoa. Overripe, mashed into a cellulosic goo, baked with allspice into a warm loaf. Or simply smothered in peanut butter. You really can’t go wrong.
Oh, the banana: the most environmentally destructive human rights infringement in a peel. You would be hard-pressed to find a productive banana tree pushing soil anywhere from Maine to California, yet it is a regular on the American grocery list. It is the most widely cultivated fruit crop in the world, grown in well over one hundred countries and ringing up four billion dollars annually in export trade. Seventy-two and a half million metric tons of the sunny fruits were produced worldwide in 2005, with India, Brazil, China, Ecuador, and the Philippines rounding out the top five growers. In the United States bananas are a luxury commodity that we grab for a breakfast on-the-go. For millions of people in developing nations who depend on them for daily calorie intake and wage, they are a matter of life or death.
The industrial plantations where most bananas are grown in Latin America, South America, Africa, and Asia are a nightmare. Critical spans of forest are clear-cut to make way for monolithic monocultures of hybrid crops that are doused with petrochemical biocides and fertilizers. Planes sweep over the rows of trees, hawk-like, dusting both plants and workers with Organochlorines. Chemical exposure has been linked to higher cancer rates among banana workers than the general population. Lack of genetic diversity in the fields makes the crop extremely susceptible to diseases and bacteria that can wipe out entire regions’ yields. This threatens the livelihoods of both workers and regional consumers.
The banana industry, like most others, is dominated by a handful of multinational corporations—Dole and Chiquita own over half of all banana cultivation in the world. Their plantations are ridden with child labor, disregard for pesticide regulations, and wages below half the legal minimum. Most employment with these companies is through contractors, so workers have no job security, do not receive benefits, cannot form unions, and are often relocated with no say in the matter. In effect, these people become migrant workers on their own land.
In March 2007, the United States Justice Department fined Chiquita Brands International $25 million for funding terrorist organizations in Latin and South America—specifically Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), among other rebel groups in the volatile nation’s countryside. This right-wing paramilitary group is responsible for most of the country’s brutal civilian slaughters and cocaine exports. Chiquita paid AUC millions of dollars in cash over an eight-year span in exchange for armed patrol of their banana plantations. That same month on her nationally syndicated public radio show Democracy Now!, Amy Goodman discussed a 1998 exposé in the Cincinnati Enquirer that revealed how “…Chiquita exposed entire communities to dangerous U.S.-banned pesticides, forced the eviction of an entire Honduran village at gunpoint and its subsequent bulldozing, suppressed unions, unwittingly allowed the use of Chiquita transport ships to move cocaine internationally, and paid a fortune to U.S. politicians to influence trade policy.”
Not such an everyday fruit, now is it?
Equipped with these banana facts, am I morally obligated to give up one of my favorite fruits? I’d say that I eat roughly one banana per week, which means 52 bananas per year. I will probably have consumed well over one thousand by the time I turn 25! How do I deal with the realization that that may as well be considered a crime?
Over the last five years I have been working to embrace the responsibility of conscientious consumption. Some of the changes I have been compelled to make have been easily incorporated into my daily life. Others, not so much. Sometimes I cheat. But ultimately, no matter what I am “giving up,” it seldom brings a sense of deprivation when I get into the swing of it. On the contrary, the adjustment brings greater feelings of fulfillment in the sense that I am sparing someone or something, somewhere, some suffering.
Nowadays it seems as if these are straightforward solutions that are becoming common knowledge and practice. The ultimate purpose of such customs is to be aware of the complexity of supply chains and to examine the social, economic, moral and environmental consequences of goods all the way from production to consumption to disposal. The difficulty in gaining awareness lies in the sheer extent of that complexity over the entire lifecycle of a product, be it an apple, a steak, or a sedan. Industries devote billions of dollars every year to covering up the pathway of suffering that begins with the cotton seed in the ground and ends not with the shirt on your back but in the landfill where that shirt ends up once you’ve worn it out. Even the “simplest” of goods—a banana—is not simple at all.
Some bananas are obviously better than others. Goodman concludes her article by saying, “That next organic, fair-trade banana you buy just might save a life.” But even if I make sure that the bunch is organic and fair trade certified, it is still shipped thousands of miles, emitting tons of carbon dioxide. The only justification I can find for purchasing the damn things is this: I love them. I love their slick, sticky meatiness. I love them in pancakes, over cereal, in trail mix, as pudding, covered in chocolate, or just as is.
I have become so hyper-conscientious and downright fearful about the smallest shred of consumption that every now and then I wonder if some therapy wouldn’t do me some good. I’m getting burned out and I’m only 21 years old. I eat, sleep, and drink sustainability—except I do not have time to eat or sleep because of it. My life is organic farming and dumpster diving and cooperative housing; committee meetings and conference calls and trainings; lobbying and education and direct action. When I told a seasoned anti-nuclear activist that I was too burned out to host an event for him, he responded, “Of course you’re burned out! We’re all burned out! And that’s not going to change because the Earth is burned out! So get used to it.”
There are many vital components to a successful sustainability movement, but if you ask me, the key point is this: it must be a sustainable sustainability movement. Surely no one can stay strong after ten, twenty, thirty years of burnout! How do we sustain ourselves? There are species to save and solar panels to install; organic vegetables to harvest and policies to pass through Congress! There are forests to protect and mountains of trash to pick up; children to teach and rights to defend! How am I going to keep up?
Environmentalism encompasses every aspect of existence. I am learning to devote my energy to one main struggle—which is?-- because each of our struggles is part of the greater whole.
The world has evolved into such a tangle of globe-spanning systems that it seems impossible to do absolutely everything right. The entire way our society is structured is wrong but we have to live in it the way it is. We can’t fix it all this instant, but we can acknowledge our roles in the process and act. Joni Mitchell said it right – we are stardust, billion year old carbon, we are golden, caught in the devil’s bargain, and we’ve got to get ourselves back to the garden. So gather your friends. Pick your fights. Pack your bags. Don’t forget the snacks. Sometimes, if you want a banana, you just have to eat one.
[This article originally appeared in the October-November 2008 issue of River Gazette, published by St. Mary's College of Maryland. www.smcm.edu/rivergazette]
Ah, the banana: that mellow yellow crescent of tropical sweetness. Pan-fried in a bath of butter and brown sugar. Serving as a vessel for mounds of frozen cream, lattices of chocolaty syrup, and a sprinkling of nuts and cherries. Simmered in a deep pot of black beans with a hint of ginger and cocoa. Overripe, mashed into a cellulosic goo, baked with allspice into a warm loaf. Or simply smothered in peanut butter. You really can’t go wrong.
Oh, the banana: the most environmentally destructive human rights infringement in a peel. You would be hard-pressed to find a productive banana tree pushing soil anywhere from Maine to California, yet it is a regular on the American grocery list. It is the most widely cultivated fruit crop in the world, grown in well over one hundred countries and ringing up four billion dollars annually in export trade. Seventy-two and a half million metric tons of the sunny fruits were produced worldwide in 2005, with India, Brazil, China, Ecuador, and the Philippines rounding out the top five growers. In the United States bananas are a luxury commodity that we grab for a breakfast on-the-go. For millions of people in developing nations who depend on them for daily calorie intake and wage, they are a matter of life or death.
The industrial plantations where most bananas are grown in Latin America, South America, Africa, and Asia are a nightmare. Critical spans of forest are clear-cut to make way for monolithic monocultures of hybrid crops that are doused with petrochemical biocides and fertilizers. Planes sweep over the rows of trees, hawk-like, dusting both plants and workers with Organochlorines. Chemical exposure has been linked to higher cancer rates among banana workers than the general population. Lack of genetic diversity in the fields makes the crop extremely susceptible to diseases and bacteria that can wipe out entire regions’ yields. This threatens the livelihoods of both workers and regional consumers.
The banana industry, like most others, is dominated by a handful of multinational corporations—Dole and Chiquita own over half of all banana cultivation in the world. Their plantations are ridden with child labor, disregard for pesticide regulations, and wages below half the legal minimum. Most employment with these companies is through contractors, so workers have no job security, do not receive benefits, cannot form unions, and are often relocated with no say in the matter. In effect, these people become migrant workers on their own land.
In March 2007, the United States Justice Department fined Chiquita Brands International $25 million for funding terrorist organizations in Latin and South America—specifically Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), among other rebel groups in the volatile nation’s countryside. This right-wing paramilitary group is responsible for most of the country’s brutal civilian slaughters and cocaine exports. Chiquita paid AUC millions of dollars in cash over an eight-year span in exchange for armed patrol of their banana plantations. That same month on her nationally syndicated public radio show Democracy Now!, Amy Goodman discussed a 1998 exposé in the Cincinnati Enquirer that revealed how “…Chiquita exposed entire communities to dangerous U.S.-banned pesticides, forced the eviction of an entire Honduran village at gunpoint and its subsequent bulldozing, suppressed unions, unwittingly allowed the use of Chiquita transport ships to move cocaine internationally, and paid a fortune to U.S. politicians to influence trade policy.”
Not such an everyday fruit, now is it?
Equipped with these banana facts, am I morally obligated to give up one of my favorite fruits? I’d say that I eat roughly one banana per week, which means 52 bananas per year. I will probably have consumed well over one thousand by the time I turn 25! How do I deal with the realization that that may as well be considered a crime?
Over the last five years I have been working to embrace the responsibility of conscientious consumption. Some of the changes I have been compelled to make have been easily incorporated into my daily life. Others, not so much. Sometimes I cheat. But ultimately, no matter what I am “giving up,” it seldom brings a sense of deprivation when I get into the swing of it. On the contrary, the adjustment brings greater feelings of fulfillment in the sense that I am sparing someone or something, somewhere, some suffering.
Nowadays it seems as if these are straightforward solutions that are becoming common knowledge and practice. The ultimate purpose of such customs is to be aware of the complexity of supply chains and to examine the social, economic, moral and environmental consequences of goods all the way from production to consumption to disposal. The difficulty in gaining awareness lies in the sheer extent of that complexity over the entire lifecycle of a product, be it an apple, a steak, or a sedan. Industries devote billions of dollars every year to covering up the pathway of suffering that begins with the cotton seed in the ground and ends not with the shirt on your back but in the landfill where that shirt ends up once you’ve worn it out. Even the “simplest” of goods—a banana—is not simple at all.
Some bananas are obviously better than others. Goodman concludes her article by saying, “That next organic, fair-trade banana you buy just might save a life.” But even if I make sure that the bunch is organic and fair trade certified, it is still shipped thousands of miles, emitting tons of carbon dioxide. The only justification I can find for purchasing the damn things is this: I love them. I love their slick, sticky meatiness. I love them in pancakes, over cereal, in trail mix, as pudding, covered in chocolate, or just as is.
I have become so hyper-conscientious and downright fearful about the smallest shred of consumption that every now and then I wonder if some therapy wouldn’t do me some good. I’m getting burned out and I’m only 21 years old. I eat, sleep, and drink sustainability—except I do not have time to eat or sleep because of it. My life is organic farming and dumpster diving and cooperative housing; committee meetings and conference calls and trainings; lobbying and education and direct action. When I told a seasoned anti-nuclear activist that I was too burned out to host an event for him, he responded, “Of course you’re burned out! We’re all burned out! And that’s not going to change because the Earth is burned out! So get used to it.”
There are many vital components to a successful sustainability movement, but if you ask me, the key point is this: it must be a sustainable sustainability movement. Surely no one can stay strong after ten, twenty, thirty years of burnout! How do we sustain ourselves? There are species to save and solar panels to install; organic vegetables to harvest and policies to pass through Congress! There are forests to protect and mountains of trash to pick up; children to teach and rights to defend! How am I going to keep up?
Environmentalism encompasses every aspect of existence. I am learning to devote my energy to one main struggle—which is?-- because each of our struggles is part of the greater whole.
The world has evolved into such a tangle of globe-spanning systems that it seems impossible to do absolutely everything right. The entire way our society is structured is wrong but we have to live in it the way it is. We can’t fix it all this instant, but we can acknowledge our roles in the process and act. Joni Mitchell said it right – we are stardust, billion year old carbon, we are golden, caught in the devil’s bargain, and we’ve got to get ourselves back to the garden. So gather your friends. Pick your fights. Pack your bags. Don’t forget the snacks. Sometimes, if you want a banana, you just have to eat one.
[This article originally appeared in the October-November 2008 issue of River Gazette, published by St. Mary's College of Maryland. www.smcm.edu/rivergazette]
16 September 2008
Little-known Plastic Bag Facts
Submitted by M.P. Crawford
While perusing the Fall 2008 issue of "Chesupioc", the newsletter of ther Chespeake Audobon Society, I happened upon these share-worthy facts researched by Kathy Woods, a Wildlife Rehabilitator, regarding plastic bags and the impact upon OUR environment. Are you ready?
Four seemingly unlikely allies, Rwanda, China, Bangladesh and Ireland, have all banned free plastic bags at the grocery store. Plastic bags are manufactured from polyethylene- a thermoplastic derived from oil. Wishing to decrease their foreign oil dependency (what a great idea!), China expects to SAVE 37 million barrels of crude oil by adhering to the bag ban. Ireland now taxes the bags and therefore has reduced usage by 90%.
As we know, these bags find their way into every imaginable airspace, water space and landscape on OUR Earth. Two-hundred species of sea life have been victimized by either consuming, choking on, or becoming entangled in plastic bags carelessly discarded. Don't think that recycling gets rid of the problem: less than one percent of plastic bags are recycled, and the cost is enormous.
So, if you think that switching from paper or plastic and carrying cloth bags (preferably of the 100% organic derivative) isn't helping much, then consider this: according to a report from National Geographic, worldwide dependence on plastic bags is set at 500 billion to 1 trillion. In one lifetime, we could save over 25,000 bags! Now that's a fact to get choked up about.
While perusing the Fall 2008 issue of "Chesupioc", the newsletter of ther Chespeake Audobon Society, I happened upon these share-worthy facts researched by Kathy Woods, a Wildlife Rehabilitator, regarding plastic bags and the impact upon OUR environment. Are you ready?
Four seemingly unlikely allies, Rwanda, China, Bangladesh and Ireland, have all banned free plastic bags at the grocery store. Plastic bags are manufactured from polyethylene- a thermoplastic derived from oil. Wishing to decrease their foreign oil dependency (what a great idea!), China expects to SAVE 37 million barrels of crude oil by adhering to the bag ban. Ireland now taxes the bags and therefore has reduced usage by 90%.
As we know, these bags find their way into every imaginable airspace, water space and landscape on OUR Earth. Two-hundred species of sea life have been victimized by either consuming, choking on, or becoming entangled in plastic bags carelessly discarded. Don't think that recycling gets rid of the problem: less than one percent of plastic bags are recycled, and the cost is enormous.
So, if you think that switching from paper or plastic and carrying cloth bags (preferably of the 100% organic derivative) isn't helping much, then consider this: according to a report from National Geographic, worldwide dependence on plastic bags is set at 500 billion to 1 trillion. In one lifetime, we could save over 25,000 bags! Now that's a fact to get choked up about.
05 September 2008
Living like Locals
Marhaba from the Middle East! I have recently moved to a region where food choices are quite limited, and environmental constraints on agricultural productions are obvious. Here, I don't have to worry that I might be buying something out of season--the only produce really available is local. But for those of you in the States, there are important decisions to be made regarding what you purchase from supermarkets and stands. Food travels thousands of miles to arrive in your area grocery store, and has used tons of energy in the packaging and transportation process. Part of the quest for sustainable living involves choosing to buy and cook things that have the least impact on the environment. This adventure can be an enjoyable and educational process, as one begins to learn what fruits and vegetables are naturally available nearby and at what times. Sure, we all know that pumpkins arrive in the fall--but these days, canned pumpkin is in the store year round, and heavy cans take a toll in production and transport. How about broccoli or tomatoes? Or oranges and peppers? I'm not saying that you must give up all food that can't be grown next door at a certain time, but you can make a significant difference in consciously buying your groceries with the Earth in mind! Besides cutting fossil fuel consumption, buying from local cooperatives and farmers builds great relationships and helps the economy. The trend towards local and organic food is definitely on the rise, and there are lots of great resources to introduce people to this concept. So don't just trust me--check it out!
For a more in depth discussion of the facts of how food affects the environment see The Sustainable Table
If you doubt that tasty, nutritious meals could be created from what is in season, check out my favorite cookbook "Simply in Season."
Lastly, Barbara Kingsolver has written a hilarious memoir of her adventure in living locally in the book Animal, Vegetable, Miracle. It is definitely worth a read and has some helpful resources and recipes inside!
Have fun living locally!
For a more in depth discussion of the facts of how food affects the environment see The Sustainable Table
If you doubt that tasty, nutritious meals could be created from what is in season, check out my favorite cookbook "Simply in Season."
Lastly, Barbara Kingsolver has written a hilarious memoir of her adventure in living locally in the book Animal, Vegetable, Miracle. It is definitely worth a read and has some helpful resources and recipes inside!
Have fun living locally!
28 August 2008
122 by 2100
As we enjoy the cooler, crisper days that signal the approach of autumn here in the Mid-Atlantic we can't let our fight against climate change die down. While the phrase "global warming" loses some of its perceived gravity in the cooler days of the year, don't forget that our actions have consequences year round and the effort to keep our environment safe for all creatures inhabiting it continues. In fact, a recent Reuters article serves to shock us out of our end of summer complacence: Dutch scientists released information that the projected course of climate change has the world on its way to dangerously high temperatures by 2100. Peak temperatures and summer heat waves will become more severe, jumping even higher than the average temperature increases caused by climate change. This means that regions in India, the Middle East, Australia, and the equatorial parts of Africa and South America will see temperatures nearing 122 degrees Fahrenheit, 50 degrees Celsius, by 2100. While temperatures in the US and Mediterranean will experience slightly smaller peak increases, those heat waves will be far from comfortable, to say the least.
To view the full article, click here.
To convince more of your friends and family members to hop on the environmentally friendly bandwagon, click here.
To view the full article, click here.
To convince more of your friends and family members to hop on the environmentally friendly bandwagon, click here.
22 August 2008
Disturbing News
A crack seven miles long and a half-mile wide has emerged at the top of Greenland, scientists from NASA and Ohio State University announced yesterday. Floating as far north as possible, this region of Greenland was previously thought to be resistant to the effects of global warming- yesterday's announcement is clear evidence to the contrary and disintegration of the glacier is now expected to occur this year.
Not yet convinced that global warming is a real threat? Take an end-of-summer vacation to Nuuk and ask the locals.
Source: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-science/20080821/SCI.Greenland.Glaciers/
Not yet convinced that global warming is a real threat? Take an end-of-summer vacation to Nuuk and ask the locals.
Source: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-science/20080821/SCI.Greenland.Glaciers/
17 August 2008
Say NO to Offshore Drilling
Even though gas prices have dropped noticeably during the last few weeks, don't let yourself be lulled into a state of complacence where oil dependence is concerned. The fact that $3.65 per gallon of regular-grade gasoline is considered a "good" price shows that we've grown accustomed to shelling out way too much money for an increasingly scarce commodity whose hidden cost packs a far greater punch for the planet than it does for our wallets.
The Environmental Defense Fund, an organization that seeks solutions to environmental problems by partnering with businesses and government agencies, has drafted a petition to tell members of Congress not to lift the ban on offshore oil drilling:
"The era of cheap oil is over and opening up environmentally sensitive areas to oil drilling will not bring it back.
Offshore oil exploration is slow and costly. The Energy Information Administration estimates that opening the coasts to offshore drilling would have no significant impact on oil prices before 2030.
The EIA also estimates that opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would reduce the cost of gas by only a few pennies per gallon, and not until 2027.
The only way to free ourselves from expensive oil is to get off oil. And the best way to do that is to support market-based policies that create economic incentives to unleash clean energy innovation and create the clean economy of the 21st century.
That's precisely what a cap on global warming pollution will do: cut our oil imports (by as much as $490 billion over the next two decades) and kick start the development of clean energy alternatives.
Washington has waited too long to develop a common sense national energy policy, and with gas at $4 per gallon, we're now paying the price. But we can respond to this energy crisis by adopting better, smarter energy policies that reward innovation and free us from oil.
I urge you to say NO to lifting the ban on offshore drilling and YES to clean energy innovation."
Tell your elected official to work for positive environmental change: http://action.edf.org/campaign/nooffshoredrilling
The Environmental Defense Fund, an organization that seeks solutions to environmental problems by partnering with businesses and government agencies, has drafted a petition to tell members of Congress not to lift the ban on offshore oil drilling:
"The era of cheap oil is over and opening up environmentally sensitive areas to oil drilling will not bring it back.
Offshore oil exploration is slow and costly. The Energy Information Administration estimates that opening the coasts to offshore drilling would have no significant impact on oil prices before 2030.
The EIA also estimates that opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would reduce the cost of gas by only a few pennies per gallon, and not until 2027.
The only way to free ourselves from expensive oil is to get off oil. And the best way to do that is to support market-based policies that create economic incentives to unleash clean energy innovation and create the clean economy of the 21st century.
That's precisely what a cap on global warming pollution will do: cut our oil imports (by as much as $490 billion over the next two decades) and kick start the development of clean energy alternatives.
Washington has waited too long to develop a common sense national energy policy, and with gas at $4 per gallon, we're now paying the price. But we can respond to this energy crisis by adopting better, smarter energy policies that reward innovation and free us from oil.
I urge you to say NO to lifting the ban on offshore drilling and YES to clean energy innovation."
Tell your elected official to work for positive environmental change: http://action.edf.org/campaign/nooffshoredrilling
11 August 2008
Bag Ladies Revisited
Contributed by M.P. Crawford
Since my last posting, I fortunately have positve news to report. The appearance of the environmentally friendly cloth reusable bags is definitely on the upswing. The checkers at the local grocery store report increased sales of these bags. Many stores, including Target at the lower end and Nordstrom on the higher end (with the price tag to prove it!) are selling stylish 100% "organically grown" bags; many that even guys would be comfortable hanging on a shoulder (so there's no excuse for the "paper or plastic?"mantra, men!)
One of the most heartening sights happened as recent as this morning. I was in the grocery check-out line behind a woman who had only purchased a salad. Per the still-unfortunate usual, the clerk placed it in one of those dreaded blue plastic bags. The woman turned to carefully survey the pile (yes, pile!) of cloth bags alongside my pending purchases upon the conveyor belt, then told the young woman to remove the salad from the bag as she did not need it and neither did the Earth.
I am pondering the possibility that on my next trip to this particular grocery of speaking to the management about reducing the cost of the cloth bags and/or giving a cash incentive to those customers who bring their reusable bags. Any step, albeit small and slow, is still a move in the right direction.
Since my last posting, I fortunately have positve news to report. The appearance of the environmentally friendly cloth reusable bags is definitely on the upswing. The checkers at the local grocery store report increased sales of these bags. Many stores, including Target at the lower end and Nordstrom on the higher end (with the price tag to prove it!) are selling stylish 100% "organically grown" bags; many that even guys would be comfortable hanging on a shoulder (so there's no excuse for the "paper or plastic?"mantra, men!)
One of the most heartening sights happened as recent as this morning. I was in the grocery check-out line behind a woman who had only purchased a salad. Per the still-unfortunate usual, the clerk placed it in one of those dreaded blue plastic bags. The woman turned to carefully survey the pile (yes, pile!) of cloth bags alongside my pending purchases upon the conveyor belt, then told the young woman to remove the salad from the bag as she did not need it and neither did the Earth.
I am pondering the possibility that on my next trip to this particular grocery of speaking to the management about reducing the cost of the cloth bags and/or giving a cash incentive to those customers who bring their reusable bags. Any step, albeit small and slow, is still a move in the right direction.
29 July 2008
Can't ditch the car? Take these tips from Ford.
Taking a cue from astronomical gas prices and the American consumer’s abrupt U-turn away from gas-guzzling vehicles, Ford has developed ten tips for EcoDriving (or, driving down your fuel usage). Attempting to be EcoCute, Ford calls EcoDriving ECOnomical (it saves money) and ECOlogical (it saves the environment). So, straight from the fossil-fuel reliant auto giant itself, here are ten tips to decrease the impact on the earth and your bank account when you’re in the car:
1. Slow down and maintain steady speed. Drive 55 miles per hour, aim for a constant speed and use cruise control whenever possible on the highway.
2. Relax. Aggressive driving wastes fuel, so accelerate smoothly from a stop and brake softly.
3. No idling. Today’s engines don’t need to warm up in cold temperatures. State the car and gentle drive away. Turn the engine off in non-traffic situations, such as at bank and fast-food drive-up windows, when idling more than 30 seconds.
4. Check your tires. Keep tires inflated to the recommended tire pressure. This alone can reduce the average amount of fuel use by 3-4 percent.
5. Be kind to your vehicle. Keep the wheels aligned. Replace air filters as recommended.
6. Travel light. Avoid piling a lot of luggage on the roof rack and remove excess weight from the vehicle.
7. Minimize use of the heater and air conditioning. Decreasing your usage of the air conditioner when temperatures are above 80 degrees can help you save 10-15 percent of fuel.
8. Close windows at high speeds. Don’t drive with the windows open unless your speed is under 50mph.
9. Choose the right oil. Look for cans marked with the symbol ECII, which is the American Society of Testing Materials logo for fuel-efficient oils.
10. Consolidate trips. This will enable you to bypass congested routes, lead to less idling, fewer start-ups and less stop-and-go traffic.
Hat tip to The Examiner, 24 July 2008.
28 July 2008
Bag Ladies
Contributed by M.P. Crawford
I find myself chuckling to myself many times over a not-so-funny matter: the climate crisis and humanity's complacency and the fact that I thrive on causes... But, to clarify, I will scale the scenario down a bit and focus on the "paper or plastic" dilemma and the small-scale war my family has waged against what that little phrase represents. Many months ago my daughter and I declared a two-woman campaign at our local food market known for its proliferation of senior citizens and aging upper middle-class "Baby Boomers". Armed with cloth bags pilfered from a much more globally-conscious food store chain we set our sights on changing the world one person at a time. I thought I was really making an impression, my various and sundry organically-derived bags languishing on the conveyer belt along side my purchases and my staunch views on ridding the Earth of pesky plastic bags and their cousins, the tree-depriving paper variety. Well what to my eyes did I see, none other than the elderly gent behind me in line requesting a cloth bag. YEAH! VICTORY! But, wait, not so fast... yes, he purchased one bag but no he did not use it. He fell under the spell of the "paper or plastic" mantra and requested his new earth-friendly bag be placed in the sinister blue villian. Many more instances of seeming defeat in this war have been witnessed by this persistent crusader.
Fast-forward two months: Same store. Same socio-economic mix. Different attitude? Yes!, albeit a tentative one. Now there are rows of the recycling cloth bags lining each check-out aisle. Before there was only one stand for the same. The check-out personnel, in particular the young ones, are especially helpful with packing the cloth bags ("It's not too heavy for you, is it?") and there is definitely an increaed amount of customers using at least one non-plastic/paper bag for their purchases. Is this learning by example? Are the rhetorical challenges and exhortations from the activists making inroads? Or, are we disgusted by a view of blue plastic "leaves" swaying from sickened trees and clogging the drains to our Bay? Perhaps the answers are none of these OR all of the above. Only time and trees and birds and fishes will tell... And this Bag Lady will continue to wage her "war" for the world!
I find myself chuckling to myself many times over a not-so-funny matter: the climate crisis and humanity's complacency and the fact that I thrive on causes... But, to clarify, I will scale the scenario down a bit and focus on the "paper or plastic" dilemma and the small-scale war my family has waged against what that little phrase represents. Many months ago my daughter and I declared a two-woman campaign at our local food market known for its proliferation of senior citizens and aging upper middle-class "Baby Boomers". Armed with cloth bags pilfered from a much more globally-conscious food store chain we set our sights on changing the world one person at a time. I thought I was really making an impression, my various and sundry organically-derived bags languishing on the conveyer belt along side my purchases and my staunch views on ridding the Earth of pesky plastic bags and their cousins, the tree-depriving paper variety. Well what to my eyes did I see, none other than the elderly gent behind me in line requesting a cloth bag. YEAH! VICTORY! But, wait, not so fast... yes, he purchased one bag but no he did not use it. He fell under the spell of the "paper or plastic" mantra and requested his new earth-friendly bag be placed in the sinister blue villian. Many more instances of seeming defeat in this war have been witnessed by this persistent crusader.
Fast-forward two months: Same store. Same socio-economic mix. Different attitude? Yes!, albeit a tentative one. Now there are rows of the recycling cloth bags lining each check-out aisle. Before there was only one stand for the same. The check-out personnel, in particular the young ones, are especially helpful with packing the cloth bags ("It's not too heavy for you, is it?") and there is definitely an increaed amount of customers using at least one non-plastic/paper bag for their purchases. Is this learning by example? Are the rhetorical challenges and exhortations from the activists making inroads? Or, are we disgusted by a view of blue plastic "leaves" swaying from sickened trees and clogging the drains to our Bay? Perhaps the answers are none of these OR all of the above. Only time and trees and birds and fishes will tell... And this Bag Lady will continue to wage her "war" for the world!
27 July 2008
Are you a “Greenfluencer”?
Porter Novelli, global communications mogul, recently coined a term for the small but powerful group of consumers now shaping trends and decisions in the mass market: Greenfluencers. Forming a small percentage of the United States population, roughly 4%, this group wields tremendous influence despite its diminutive size. The group is “young, racially diverse and outspoken on a variety of social and political issues. And while Greenfluencers are more economically savvy than their peers, they are still relatively mainstream in their lifestyle choices. This accessibility combined with a high level of social connectivity has enabled this group to become the voice of authority on the sustainable lifestyle.” (Baltimore Examiner, 24 July 2008)
Greenfluencers seek out energy efficient products and use their buying power to chastise companies with poor environmental track records by boycotting their goods. With this knowledge and a newly developed “Green Gauge”, Porter Novelli intends to assist its corporate clients with green product concepts and marketing claims that appeal to this new and persuasive group of consumers. Who says a small group can’t affect big change?
Click here for the Porter Novelli description of Greenfluencers: http://www.porternovelli.com/site/pressrelease.aspx?pressrelease_id=181&pgname=news
Greenfluencers seek out energy efficient products and use their buying power to chastise companies with poor environmental track records by boycotting their goods. With this knowledge and a newly developed “Green Gauge”, Porter Novelli intends to assist its corporate clients with green product concepts and marketing claims that appeal to this new and persuasive group of consumers. Who says a small group can’t affect big change?
Click here for the Porter Novelli description of Greenfluencers: http://www.porternovelli.com/site/pressrelease.aspx?pressrelease_id=181&pgname=news
17 July 2008
Press Release: Al Gore's Climate Challenge
Washington, DC – To reset the way Americans think about the energy future and the climate crisis, former Vice President and Nobel Peace Prize winner Al Gore issued a bold challenge Thursday: that 100 percent of U.S. electricity production come from sources with zero carbon emissions within 10 years.
Gore also clearly made the case that the biggest problems we are facing right now are connected and must be solved together. "We are borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet. Every bit of that’s got to change," Vice President Gore said. "But if we grab hold of that common thread and pull it hard," Gore continued, "all of these complex problems begin to unravel and we will find that we are holding the answer to all of them right in our hand. The answer is to end our reliance on carbon-based fuels. I’m convinced that one reason we’ve seemed paralyzed in the face of these crises is our tendency to offer old solutions to each crisis separately – without taking the others into account. And these outdated proposals have not only been ineffective – they almost always make the other crises even worse."
In the speech hosted by the "We" Campaign, Gore challenged all Americans to solve America’s economic, environmental and national security crises by rallying behind a single, comprehensive objective.
"This goal is achievable, affordable and transformative. It represents a challenge to all Americans – in every walk of life: our political leaders, entrepreneurs, innovators, engineers and every citizen," said Gore.
Among the dangers in not creating a new energy infrastructure, Gore said, is that fuel prices will continue to rise and weaken the U.S. economy. He encouraged Americans to not accept the solutions of the past, like drilling for more oil. Gore described the following as components of meeting this challenge:
The growing wind and solar sectors need to be expanded through continued investment and innovation.
Other renewables should be added to the mix – geothermal and solar thermal with storage capability – and we should start planning for that now.
The greatest gains can be made in energy efficiency. For instance, existing technologies can raise household efficiency by 30 percent.
America must invest in a Unified National Grid that would link every household and move cost-effective renewable electricity from places where the supply is vast to where the power is needed most.
We should retain the existing fossil fuel-free energy production from nuclear and hydroelectric power.
We must learn to safely store and capture carbon from coal and gas. Until then, these fossil fuels cannot be "clean."
Cathy Zoi, CEO of the Alliance for Climate Protection, which is coordinating the nearly 1.4 million-strong "We" Campaign, noted that Gore has laid down a bold yet achievable goal, and that the only thing missing was the political will. She vowed to focus the energy and resources of the "We" Campaign behind this effort. "This is ambitious and achievable," Zoi said, "but in order to make it work, all Americans need to come together. Investors and innovators must continue to develop solutions and bring them to market. Businesses can lead by example, improving efficiency and supporting policy changes in the right direction. Political leaders – at every level – must commit to this goal and see it through. And individuals must press their leaders for change." In the speech Gore noted that Americans had proven before that they can rise to a transformational challenge within a decade.
"When President John F. Kennedy challenged our nation to land a man on the moon and bring him back safely in 10 years, many people doubted we could accomplish that goal. But 8 years and 2 months later, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the surface of the moon," Gore said.
A variety of voices spoke out in support of Vice President Gore’s challenge. Noting that this is a non-partisan issue that all Americans need to get behind, former Republican Congressman Sherwood Boehlert added, "Meeting this challenge is not a political issue; it is a fundamental issue about our economic future. This plan would provide real stability to the American economy for the next generation. Once we make the initial capital investments, the fuel is free and no other country or group can restrict our access to it. Renewable fuels – sun, wind, geothermal – are free; they’re not traded on the global market so they are not subject to huge spikes in price. This is the kind of economic security American families want and deserve." Calling Gore’s challenge both "audacious" and "timely," President of the World Resources Institute Jonathan Lash said: "Imagine our future and our children’s future if we seize the moment. We need to change the debate in this country from what we can’t do to what we can do. America has led every major technological shift in the last 100 years, and we can lead the next one as well. The problem is not technology, it is political will." Author and climate activist Bill McKibben said: "Finally a response to both the science of climate and the economics of energy on a scale commensurate with the problem. This is a plan that breaks us out of muddling, temporizing stalemate and sets a clear path forward towards an imaginable future. I’m not sure what prize you get once you’ve won the Nobel, but this initiative deserves it." Dr. James Hansen, the director of NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, added: "This is just what the doctor ordered: to cure our carbon addiction and stimulate the economy." Meeting this challenge, Dr. Hansen said, "would be the turning point that is needed to lead the world to a stable climate." At the end of his remarks, Gore asked all Americans to answer the call of history.
"Many Americans have begun to wonder whether or not we’ve simply lost our appetite for bold policy solutions," Gore said. "And folks who claim to know how our system works these days have told us we might as well forget about our political system doing anything bold, especially if it is contrary to the wishes of special interests. And I’ve got to admit, that sure seems to be the way things have been going. But I’ve begun to hear different voices in this country from people who are not only tired of baby steps and special interest politics, but are hungry for a new, different and bold approach."
"We must now lift our nation to reach another goal that will change history. Our entire civilization depends upon us now embarking on a new journey of exploration and discovery. Our success depends on our willingness as a people to undertake this journey and to complete it within 10 years. Once again, we have an opportunity to take a giant leap for humankind," Gore concluded.
To watch the video of Gore's speech and read the full transcript, click here: http://www.wecansolveit.org/pages/al_gore_a_generational_challenge_to_repower_america/
Gore also clearly made the case that the biggest problems we are facing right now are connected and must be solved together. "We are borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet. Every bit of that’s got to change," Vice President Gore said. "But if we grab hold of that common thread and pull it hard," Gore continued, "all of these complex problems begin to unravel and we will find that we are holding the answer to all of them right in our hand. The answer is to end our reliance on carbon-based fuels. I’m convinced that one reason we’ve seemed paralyzed in the face of these crises is our tendency to offer old solutions to each crisis separately – without taking the others into account. And these outdated proposals have not only been ineffective – they almost always make the other crises even worse."
In the speech hosted by the "We" Campaign, Gore challenged all Americans to solve America’s economic, environmental and national security crises by rallying behind a single, comprehensive objective.
"This goal is achievable, affordable and transformative. It represents a challenge to all Americans – in every walk of life: our political leaders, entrepreneurs, innovators, engineers and every citizen," said Gore.
Among the dangers in not creating a new energy infrastructure, Gore said, is that fuel prices will continue to rise and weaken the U.S. economy. He encouraged Americans to not accept the solutions of the past, like drilling for more oil. Gore described the following as components of meeting this challenge:
The growing wind and solar sectors need to be expanded through continued investment and innovation.
Other renewables should be added to the mix – geothermal and solar thermal with storage capability – and we should start planning for that now.
The greatest gains can be made in energy efficiency. For instance, existing technologies can raise household efficiency by 30 percent.
America must invest in a Unified National Grid that would link every household and move cost-effective renewable electricity from places where the supply is vast to where the power is needed most.
We should retain the existing fossil fuel-free energy production from nuclear and hydroelectric power.
We must learn to safely store and capture carbon from coal and gas. Until then, these fossil fuels cannot be "clean."
Cathy Zoi, CEO of the Alliance for Climate Protection, which is coordinating the nearly 1.4 million-strong "We" Campaign, noted that Gore has laid down a bold yet achievable goal, and that the only thing missing was the political will. She vowed to focus the energy and resources of the "We" Campaign behind this effort. "This is ambitious and achievable," Zoi said, "but in order to make it work, all Americans need to come together. Investors and innovators must continue to develop solutions and bring them to market. Businesses can lead by example, improving efficiency and supporting policy changes in the right direction. Political leaders – at every level – must commit to this goal and see it through. And individuals must press their leaders for change." In the speech Gore noted that Americans had proven before that they can rise to a transformational challenge within a decade.
"When President John F. Kennedy challenged our nation to land a man on the moon and bring him back safely in 10 years, many people doubted we could accomplish that goal. But 8 years and 2 months later, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the surface of the moon," Gore said.
A variety of voices spoke out in support of Vice President Gore’s challenge. Noting that this is a non-partisan issue that all Americans need to get behind, former Republican Congressman Sherwood Boehlert added, "Meeting this challenge is not a political issue; it is a fundamental issue about our economic future. This plan would provide real stability to the American economy for the next generation. Once we make the initial capital investments, the fuel is free and no other country or group can restrict our access to it. Renewable fuels – sun, wind, geothermal – are free; they’re not traded on the global market so they are not subject to huge spikes in price. This is the kind of economic security American families want and deserve." Calling Gore’s challenge both "audacious" and "timely," President of the World Resources Institute Jonathan Lash said: "Imagine our future and our children’s future if we seize the moment. We need to change the debate in this country from what we can’t do to what we can do. America has led every major technological shift in the last 100 years, and we can lead the next one as well. The problem is not technology, it is political will." Author and climate activist Bill McKibben said: "Finally a response to both the science of climate and the economics of energy on a scale commensurate with the problem. This is a plan that breaks us out of muddling, temporizing stalemate and sets a clear path forward towards an imaginable future. I’m not sure what prize you get once you’ve won the Nobel, but this initiative deserves it." Dr. James Hansen, the director of NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, added: "This is just what the doctor ordered: to cure our carbon addiction and stimulate the economy." Meeting this challenge, Dr. Hansen said, "would be the turning point that is needed to lead the world to a stable climate." At the end of his remarks, Gore asked all Americans to answer the call of history.
"Many Americans have begun to wonder whether or not we’ve simply lost our appetite for bold policy solutions," Gore said. "And folks who claim to know how our system works these days have told us we might as well forget about our political system doing anything bold, especially if it is contrary to the wishes of special interests. And I’ve got to admit, that sure seems to be the way things have been going. But I’ve begun to hear different voices in this country from people who are not only tired of baby steps and special interest politics, but are hungry for a new, different and bold approach."
"We must now lift our nation to reach another goal that will change history. Our entire civilization depends upon us now embarking on a new journey of exploration and discovery. Our success depends on our willingness as a people to undertake this journey and to complete it within 10 years. Once again, we have an opportunity to take a giant leap for humankind," Gore concluded.
To watch the video of Gore's speech and read the full transcript, click here: http://www.wecansolveit.org/pages/al_gore_a_generational_challenge_to_repower_america/
14 July 2008
News Flash: Al Gore to Deliver Unprecedented Speech
On Thursday, July 17th at 12pm (EDT) Al Gore will deliver a speech at D.A.R. Constitution Hall in Washington, D.C.
The speech is hosted by the "We" Campaign and will provide a new way of thinking about energy production and consumption in the United States, as well as a view of what is attainable when we work together. Gore intends to propose a means of utilizing America's innovative skills to build a more stable and secure energy future.
Stay tuned for details following the event.
***
D.A.R. Constitution Hall is located at 1776 D St., NW, Washington, D.C.
The "We" campaign was founded by Al Gore and is an organizing and mobilizing effort using grassroots partnerships and online activation to garner support for solutions to the climate crisis. For more information, visit www.wecansolveit.org.
The speech is hosted by the "We" Campaign and will provide a new way of thinking about energy production and consumption in the United States, as well as a view of what is attainable when we work together. Gore intends to propose a means of utilizing America's innovative skills to build a more stable and secure energy future.
Stay tuned for details following the event.
***
D.A.R. Constitution Hall is located at 1776 D St., NW, Washington, D.C.
The "We" campaign was founded by Al Gore and is an organizing and mobilizing effort using grassroots partnerships and online activation to garner support for solutions to the climate crisis. For more information, visit www.wecansolveit.org.
13 July 2008
Food & the Climate Crisis: What You Can Do!
What food we chose to eat is probably the single most important decision we make as individuals. While not always something we give much thought to, this choice has such a wide-spreading impact on the health of our bodies, our community, and the world around us. The environmental impact of food production and consumption is often a large piece of the puzzle that is left out of the conversation when discussing the climate crisis.
Ever since the Green Revolution, industrial agriculture has been expanding at alarming rates. One of the most important contributions of the Green Revolution was the creation of synthetic fertilizers. Before this time, plants were dependent on the sun’s energy to grow, and so they had certain physical limits to growth. When it was discovered that energy could be manufactured by fixating nitrogen into soil through the use of petroleum, agriculture, and the food we eat, was changed forever. No longer do plants rely on the sun for energy, but on petroleum. Therefore, the energy we consume comes from fossil fuels. It has been estimated that over 70% of all energy we intake is now from oil!
That doesn’t even take into account the massive amount of energy that is required to package, ship, and refrigerate food. All of this is done through the use of petroleum. We then purchase the food in a grocery store, drive home in our cars, and put it into our fossil fuel powered refrigerator. Nor does this take into account the massive amount of (petroleum-based) pesticides and herbicides that are sprayed onto our food. These not only leach into local water supplies and destroy ecosystems, but also lead to cancer in humans.
And one of the major contributing sources of greenhouse gases in the world is meat production. (This is not meant to be a rant to turn people into vegetarians or vegans, but it is meant to make people think about where their meat came from and the environmental impact it truly has). It takes about 20 pounds of grain just to make one pound of beef. All of this grain must be grown (with synthetic fertilizers and pesticides) and then fed to the cattle. It takes about eight pounds of grain to make a single pound of chicken. This is not even taking into account the literally tens of thousands of gallons of water it takes to make a single pound of meat.
According to the Center for a New American Dream, eating one less beef meal each week saves 300 lbs of carbon dioxide each year. That’s one less beef meal a week! Think about the impact one could have by cutting a majority or all of the meat from their diet. The single greatest thing an individual can do to stop the climate crisis is to eat less meat or none at all! I know people don’t like to hear it, but it is true! Becoming a vegetarian shrinks your personal carbon footprint more than switching your car to a Toyota Prius. Not only that, but every time an American becomes a vegetarian, 1 acre of trees and 1.1 million gallons of water are saved each year. That individual will also pollute half as much water every year.
All of this sounds overwhelming, and it is! But there are many small-simple steps that everyone can take to start changing your diet to one that is healthy for your body, your family, your community, your county, and the planet!
1) Eat Local – Purchase as much produce as you can from sources that are as close as possible. This will cut down significantly on the amount of shipping that is necessary to get your food from farm-to-fork, in turn reducing the amount it contributed to the climate crisis. Plus, eating local helps to invest in local agriculture instead of large agricultural corporations
2) Eat Organic – While it has become a green washing tool for many large agribusinesses, organic agriculture is important in the fight against climate change. Organic food was grown without synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and genetically modified foods and it uses practices that replenish the soil instead of destroying it.
3) Eat in Season – This will ensure that your food is fresh and foods will not have to be shipped across the globe to reach your plate. Eating in season goes hand-in-hand with eating local and helps support community food security!
4) Eat Lower on the Food Chain – This might mean eating one meal without meat per week or completely cutting meat and dairy from your diet, but whatever you do, lowering or eliminating meat from your diet is the single most important thing you can do to help fight climate change!
Below are a list of some recommended websites to learn more about the connection between food & the environment and steps you can take towards a more sustainable future!
Sustainable Table: www.sustainabletable.org
Eat Well Guide: www.eatwellguide.org
Local Harvest: www.localharvest.org
The Vegetarian Resource Group: www.vrg.org
GoVeg: www.goveg.com
Ever since the Green Revolution, industrial agriculture has been expanding at alarming rates. One of the most important contributions of the Green Revolution was the creation of synthetic fertilizers. Before this time, plants were dependent on the sun’s energy to grow, and so they had certain physical limits to growth. When it was discovered that energy could be manufactured by fixating nitrogen into soil through the use of petroleum, agriculture, and the food we eat, was changed forever. No longer do plants rely on the sun for energy, but on petroleum. Therefore, the energy we consume comes from fossil fuels. It has been estimated that over 70% of all energy we intake is now from oil!
That doesn’t even take into account the massive amount of energy that is required to package, ship, and refrigerate food. All of this is done through the use of petroleum. We then purchase the food in a grocery store, drive home in our cars, and put it into our fossil fuel powered refrigerator. Nor does this take into account the massive amount of (petroleum-based) pesticides and herbicides that are sprayed onto our food. These not only leach into local water supplies and destroy ecosystems, but also lead to cancer in humans.
And one of the major contributing sources of greenhouse gases in the world is meat production. (This is not meant to be a rant to turn people into vegetarians or vegans, but it is meant to make people think about where their meat came from and the environmental impact it truly has). It takes about 20 pounds of grain just to make one pound of beef. All of this grain must be grown (with synthetic fertilizers and pesticides) and then fed to the cattle. It takes about eight pounds of grain to make a single pound of chicken. This is not even taking into account the literally tens of thousands of gallons of water it takes to make a single pound of meat.
According to the Center for a New American Dream, eating one less beef meal each week saves 300 lbs of carbon dioxide each year. That’s one less beef meal a week! Think about the impact one could have by cutting a majority or all of the meat from their diet. The single greatest thing an individual can do to stop the climate crisis is to eat less meat or none at all! I know people don’t like to hear it, but it is true! Becoming a vegetarian shrinks your personal carbon footprint more than switching your car to a Toyota Prius. Not only that, but every time an American becomes a vegetarian, 1 acre of trees and 1.1 million gallons of water are saved each year. That individual will also pollute half as much water every year.
All of this sounds overwhelming, and it is! But there are many small-simple steps that everyone can take to start changing your diet to one that is healthy for your body, your family, your community, your county, and the planet!
1) Eat Local – Purchase as much produce as you can from sources that are as close as possible. This will cut down significantly on the amount of shipping that is necessary to get your food from farm-to-fork, in turn reducing the amount it contributed to the climate crisis. Plus, eating local helps to invest in local agriculture instead of large agricultural corporations
2) Eat Organic – While it has become a green washing tool for many large agribusinesses, organic agriculture is important in the fight against climate change. Organic food was grown without synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and genetically modified foods and it uses practices that replenish the soil instead of destroying it.
3) Eat in Season – This will ensure that your food is fresh and foods will not have to be shipped across the globe to reach your plate. Eating in season goes hand-in-hand with eating local and helps support community food security!
4) Eat Lower on the Food Chain – This might mean eating one meal without meat per week or completely cutting meat and dairy from your diet, but whatever you do, lowering or eliminating meat from your diet is the single most important thing you can do to help fight climate change!
Below are a list of some recommended websites to learn more about the connection between food & the environment and steps you can take towards a more sustainable future!
Sustainable Table: www.sustainabletable.org
Eat Well Guide: www.eatwellguide.org
Local Harvest: www.localharvest.org
The Vegetarian Resource Group: www.vrg.org
GoVeg: www.goveg.com
Forget what Kermit said. It IS easy being green!
There is a common misconception that switching to a greener lifestyle requires a great deal of sacrifice, but making small changes to reduce your consumption and decrease your carbon footprint is easy. In fact, there are several things you can RIGHT NOW to decrease your impact on the environment. Read on for a brief list of painless steps to a greener you.
1. Unplug your cell phone/iPod/ PDA/ laptop charger when it isn’t in use. Surprisingly enough, these little power cords suck up energy just by sitting there.
2. Turn off your screensaver. The flying ribbons and hypnotic pipes were developed to extend the lifespan of monochrome monitors, which are not obsolete. Your swanky new machine is much less likely to experience the image “burn in” to which old machines fell prey. Better yet, just turn off your monitor altogether or adjust your power settings to enable hibernation or sleep mode when the computer is idle.
3. Change your light bulbs. Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs (CFLs) use about 75% less energy and last much longer than incandescent bulbs. http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=cfls.pr_cfls
4. Make your home cooler in the winter and warmer in the summer. Adjusting your thermostat down 2o in the winter and up 2o in the summer will save about a ton of carbon dioxide each year—not to mention the money you’ll save on your heating and cooling bills.
5. Cover your pots and pans while cooking. Trapping heat in the dish decreases cooking time and saves energy.
6. Sing in the shower, not the bath. The average bath uses 30-50 gallons of water, while the average 4-minute shower uses 20 gallons of water. Don’t believe there is much of difference? Stop the drain while you take a shower and compare the water level to that of your usual bath.
7. Take shorter showers.
8. Use a clothesline. Mother Nature can dry your laundry just as effectively as your dryer, and she even gives your clothes that fresh, sunny scent without the help of dryer sheets.
9. Recycle. Enough said.
10. Invest in a reusable water bottle instead of buying bottled water. You’ll reduce plastic waste and save money. http://www.kleankanteen.com/
11. Don’t brown-bag it. Pull your old lunch box/bag out of storage and use it to pack your lunches instead of plastic or paper bags. I find that my lunch sack from middle school with the multicolored frogs on it is an excellent conversation starter at work.
12. Buy locally grown foods. If your fruits and vegetables have crossed more state lines than you did on your post-college road trip, there is a problem. Buying locally reduces fuel consumption and stimulates the community economy.
13. Snag a reusable grocery bag. Most major food markets have jumped on the reusable bag bandwagon so it’s easy to pick up one or four when you’re checking out. Using these bags eliminates the need for plastic grocery bags, which end up in trees and streams too frequently. Bonus points if you can find one made of organic materials.
14. Walk, bike, carpool, or take mass transit on your daily commute. Cars run on gasoline and emit carbon, so the fewer miles you drive, the better—especially now that you have to take out a loan to buy gas.
15. Take the Good Neighbor Pledge and make a promise to help stop global warming. See the National Wildlife Federation’s website for more information: http://www.nwf.org/goodneighbor/pledge.cfm
05 July 2008
Creation Care and Environmental Stewardship
Why do people care what happens to the Earth? What makes an individual willing to sacrifice aspects of their lifestyle in order to better our common world? The motivations that people have for a concern about the environment vary wildly. The value we place on anything can be the result of personal moral conscience, personal gain, community standards, or religious codes. While some people believe that the environment is of intrinsic importance, or want to help "just because," others require a stronger theological basis in order to justify their involvement in projects that are environmentally beneficial.
Certain American Christians have recently gained publicity for their growing concern about climate change and pollution. They have coined the phrase "Creation Care" to describe their efforts, highlighting the motivation they have for working on these issues--they are literally 'taking care of [God's]creation.' Countering a previously prevalent mentality among some Christians that it didn't matter what happened to the earth because it would all be destroyed in the coming age, Evangelical groups now see the Biblical scriptures commanding humans to be 'stewards' of the created world. Because God cared enough to make it for us, and set us in charge, the logic runs, now we have to keep it going.
Obviously, Christians are a very diverse group who have a myriad of positions on political and social issues. Therefore, it is significant that the Creation Care movement has galvanized a whole spectrum of theological traditions, from more left-leaning mainline denominations to right-leaning Evangelical Protestants, to Catholics, Quakers, and Mennonites. A quick Google search yields millions of sites dedicated to discussing Creation Care, such as creationcare.org which offers scriptural support and ideas for alleviating climate change. There are obvious differences in approach, from individual or household levels of conservation to churchwide initiatives, to lobbying as Christians in the political sphere for action by the government. Yet, it seems to be a consensus that what resources we use and how we consume them matters from a faith perspective.
So what is being done in the name of Creation Care? Churches are switching their lightbulbs, banning foam cups from coffee hour, and preaching about reducing, reusing, and recycling. Christians are promoting hybrid cars and alternate transportation, supporting local agricultural initiatives, and carrying reusable grocery bags. Reverence for the earth is in! Additionally, Christians are recognizing the effects of changing weather patterns and pollution on the poorest and most vulnerable people around the world. It is no longer just about the land and sea, but also about people and how they are affected. Tsunamis and hurricanes, droughts and fuel shortages make the news daily and remind everyone that the choices they make impact others far away.
Ultimately, will local and regional efforts stem the tide of climate change? I believe that certain steps must be taken by organizations with power, like the government, to shift the way energy is created, processed, and consumed in this country. This remains a contentious issue in 'Creation Care' for those who do not like to see interference in the capitalist markets. More remains to be discussed on another day, but for now it is good to see that churches with considerable sway and prestige are opening up to the cause of the Earth and no longer find environmental protection at odds with their convictions. The Christian ethic is thus holistic, finding care of nature and care of people to be essential elements of the faith.
Certain American Christians have recently gained publicity for their growing concern about climate change and pollution. They have coined the phrase "Creation Care" to describe their efforts, highlighting the motivation they have for working on these issues--they are literally 'taking care of [God's]creation.' Countering a previously prevalent mentality among some Christians that it didn't matter what happened to the earth because it would all be destroyed in the coming age, Evangelical groups now see the Biblical scriptures commanding humans to be 'stewards' of the created world. Because God cared enough to make it for us, and set us in charge, the logic runs, now we have to keep it going.
Obviously, Christians are a very diverse group who have a myriad of positions on political and social issues. Therefore, it is significant that the Creation Care movement has galvanized a whole spectrum of theological traditions, from more left-leaning mainline denominations to right-leaning Evangelical Protestants, to Catholics, Quakers, and Mennonites. A quick Google search yields millions of sites dedicated to discussing Creation Care, such as creationcare.org which offers scriptural support and ideas for alleviating climate change. There are obvious differences in approach, from individual or household levels of conservation to churchwide initiatives, to lobbying as Christians in the political sphere for action by the government. Yet, it seems to be a consensus that what resources we use and how we consume them matters from a faith perspective.
So what is being done in the name of Creation Care? Churches are switching their lightbulbs, banning foam cups from coffee hour, and preaching about reducing, reusing, and recycling. Christians are promoting hybrid cars and alternate transportation, supporting local agricultural initiatives, and carrying reusable grocery bags. Reverence for the earth is in! Additionally, Christians are recognizing the effects of changing weather patterns and pollution on the poorest and most vulnerable people around the world. It is no longer just about the land and sea, but also about people and how they are affected. Tsunamis and hurricanes, droughts and fuel shortages make the news daily and remind everyone that the choices they make impact others far away.
Ultimately, will local and regional efforts stem the tide of climate change? I believe that certain steps must be taken by organizations with power, like the government, to shift the way energy is created, processed, and consumed in this country. This remains a contentious issue in 'Creation Care' for those who do not like to see interference in the capitalist markets. More remains to be discussed on another day, but for now it is good to see that churches with considerable sway and prestige are opening up to the cause of the Earth and no longer find environmental protection at odds with their convictions. The Christian ethic is thus holistic, finding care of nature and care of people to be essential elements of the faith.
04 July 2008
What is the IPCC and why should I care?
I will start out by saying this warning for all of my posts: I am not a climate change scientist. I do not claim to be a climate change scientist and I probably never will be a climate change scientist. With that out of the way, I would like to lend you my credentials: I am a current graduate student in Baltimore, Maryland studying for a PhD in Molecular Genetics. I am here as an interpreter to everything science. I will try to explain what facts are supported by scientist and what facts are not currently supported by scientists. I endeavor to present the facts and let you judge, but I have to admit a bias toward believing in climate change.
With that I would like to introduce you to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC is sort of the end all for all scientific data on climate change. It was established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Every few years the IPCC publishes a report detailing the basic and specific conclusions concerning climate change. It DOES NOT conduct any research. It gathers research data from around the globe on the subject of climate change.
Here are the answers to a few questions you may be asking at this point:
Who is part of the IPCC? Everyone! Litterally, the IPCC is made up of governments, scientist, and people
Why do we need the IPCC? Isn't it just a bureaucratic conglomerate of like-minded idealists?
The goal of the IPCC is to provide objective data for governments and policy-makers on the subject of climate change. In their own words:
"The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation. Review by experts and governments is an essential part of the IPCC process."
I would make a point that the IPCC is overseen by all the world's governments and merely works with them to make them aware of the data that is present on climate change. They are like-mined idealists, this cannot be denied, but they only present the facts and what they believe the facts conclude.
As stated before, the IPCC publishes a report every few years gathering the data on climate change. It is my endevor, through the next few posts, to break down the 2007 report into it's subsequent parts and try to explain the science and implication of that research. I must warn you that this is a 52 page document and it does get hefty at points. If successful though, I hope that this information gets to a new audience.
With that I would like to introduce you to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC is sort of the end all for all scientific data on climate change. It was established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Every few years the IPCC publishes a report detailing the basic and specific conclusions concerning climate change. It DOES NOT conduct any research. It gathers research data from around the globe on the subject of climate change.
Here are the answers to a few questions you may be asking at this point:
Who is part of the IPCC? Everyone! Litterally, the IPCC is made up of governments, scientist, and people
Why do we need the IPCC? Isn't it just a bureaucratic conglomerate of like-minded idealists?
The goal of the IPCC is to provide objective data for governments and policy-makers on the subject of climate change. In their own words:
"The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation. Review by experts and governments is an essential part of the IPCC process."
I would make a point that the IPCC is overseen by all the world's governments and merely works with them to make them aware of the data that is present on climate change. They are like-mined idealists, this cannot be denied, but they only present the facts and what they believe the facts conclude.
As stated before, the IPCC publishes a report every few years gathering the data on climate change. It is my endevor, through the next few posts, to break down the 2007 report into it's subsequent parts and try to explain the science and implication of that research. I must warn you that this is a 52 page document and it does get hefty at points. If successful though, I hope that this information gets to a new audience.
29 June 2008
Welcome to Shift the Tide
Have you ever felt crippled by the realization that you are just one person standing before a daunting problem? I have. It seems like the daily news is filled with tales of devastation: hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, wildfires, melting ice caps, rising sea levels, pollution. It can be extremely frustrating and downright unnerving.
The purpose of Shift the Tide is to bring an end to this sentiment of frustration. When we join together we lose the feeling of helplessness and gain the ability to create great change. In the coming weeks, months, and what I hope will be years this site will connect you with news, avenues for action, and ways to make small changes in your daily routine that can help our environment. We will keep you abreast of the latest petitions to your government officials, let you know when climate change victories have been won and when setbacks have been encountered, introduce you to other groups and websites, and establish a handbook of sorts for living in an eco-friendly manner.
Shift the Tide is a nonpartisan open arena for discussion and dissemination of ideas. This is a network for the Average Joe and Jane. This is a call to the young, the not-so-young-anymore, the experienced activist and the first-time reusable grocery bag user. It is time to stop debating the issue of climate change as a political agenda item and start taking action. No matter which point on the political spectrum you call your own and whether or not you feel that climate change is an urgent matter that we as humans have caused and can stop, working to improve our environment is not detrimental to anyone’s welfare.
Small changes can make a great and positive impact on our environment, so why shouldn’t we incorporate them into our daily lives? Whether you’re a tree-loving environmentalist who signs every clean energy petition or a climate change skeptic who is uncertain of the role we humans play in this global trend, it pays (often literally) to be nice to the world we all share. We are all connected and we must start acting like it.
Welcome to Shift the Tide, now let's start making waves.
The purpose of Shift the Tide is to bring an end to this sentiment of frustration. When we join together we lose the feeling of helplessness and gain the ability to create great change. In the coming weeks, months, and what I hope will be years this site will connect you with news, avenues for action, and ways to make small changes in your daily routine that can help our environment. We will keep you abreast of the latest petitions to your government officials, let you know when climate change victories have been won and when setbacks have been encountered, introduce you to other groups and websites, and establish a handbook of sorts for living in an eco-friendly manner.
Shift the Tide is a nonpartisan open arena for discussion and dissemination of ideas. This is a network for the Average Joe and Jane. This is a call to the young, the not-so-young-anymore, the experienced activist and the first-time reusable grocery bag user. It is time to stop debating the issue of climate change as a political agenda item and start taking action. No matter which point on the political spectrum you call your own and whether or not you feel that climate change is an urgent matter that we as humans have caused and can stop, working to improve our environment is not detrimental to anyone’s welfare.
Small changes can make a great and positive impact on our environment, so why shouldn’t we incorporate them into our daily lives? Whether you’re a tree-loving environmentalist who signs every clean energy petition or a climate change skeptic who is uncertain of the role we humans play in this global trend, it pays (often literally) to be nice to the world we all share. We are all connected and we must start acting like it.
Welcome to Shift the Tide, now let's start making waves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
